Peru vs Ukraine: Adequacy of social safety net programs
Adequacy of social safety net programs over time
- Peru
- Ukraine
How they compare
Peru currently reports 4.2% against 4.0% in Ukraine, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 31st and Ukraine ranks 32nd of 35 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 10.2% | 9.9% | 0.3% | Peru |
| 2020s | 6.5% | 4.0% | 2.5% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of social safety net programs, Peru or Ukraine?
- Peru, at 4.2% against 4.0% in Ukraine as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of social safety net programs between Peru and Ukraine?
- 0.2%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Ukraine?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Peru and Ukraine rank globally for adequacy of social safety net programs?
- Peru ranks 31st and Ukraine ranks 32nd of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Adequacy of social safety net programs (% of total welfare of beneficiary households). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adequacy of social safety net programs is measured by the total transfer amount received by the population participating in social safety net programs as a share of their total welfare. Welfare is defined as the total income or total expenditure of beneficiary households. Social safety net programs include cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.