Chile vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of social safety net programs
Adequacy of social safety net programs over time
- Chile
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 16.9% against 16.8% in Chile, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 10th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 9th of 35 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.4% | 9.2% | 4.8% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 7.1% | 13.2% | 6.1% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 12.4% | 16.9% | 4.5% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of social safety net programs, Chile or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 16.9% against 16.8% in Chile as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of social safety net programs between Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.1%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of social safety net programs?
- Chile ranks 10th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 9th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Adequacy of social safety net programs (% of total welfare of beneficiary households). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adequacy of social safety net programs is measured by the total transfer amount received by the population participating in social safety net programs as a share of their total welfare. Welfare is defined as the total income or total expenditure of beneficiary households. Social safety net programs include cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.