Brazil vs Serbia: Adequacy of social safety net programs
Adequacy of social safety net programs over time
- Brazil
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 26.4% against 25.9% in Brazil, a difference of 0.5%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 6th and Serbia ranks 5th of 35 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 19.6% | 24.4% | 4.8% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 21.9% | 27.1% | 5.2% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of social safety net programs, Brazil or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 26.4% against 25.9% in Brazil as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of social safety net programs between Brazil and Serbia?
- 0.5%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2022.
- How do Brazil and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of social safety net programs?
- Brazil ranks 6th and Serbia ranks 5th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Adequacy of social safety net programs (% of total welfare of beneficiary households). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adequacy of social safety net programs is measured by the total transfer amount received by the population participating in social safety net programs as a share of their total welfare. Welfare is defined as the total income or total expenditure of beneficiary households. Social safety net programs include cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.