Belarus vs Moldova: Adequacy of social safety net programs (% of total welfare)
Adequacy of social safety net programs (% of total welfare) over time
- Belarus
- Moldova
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 13.4% against 13.2% in Moldova, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Moldova ahead.
Belarus ranks 14th and Moldova ranks 15th of 35 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of social safety net programs, Belarus or Moldova?
- Belarus, at 13.4% against 13.2% in Moldova as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of social safety net programs between Belarus and Moldova?
- 0.2%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Moldova?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2018.
- How do Belarus and Moldova rank globally for adequacy of social safety net programs?
- Belarus ranks 14th and Moldova ranks 15th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Adequacy of social safety net programs (% of total welfare of beneficiary households). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adequacy of social safety net programs is measured by the total transfer amount received by the population participating in social safety net programs as a share of their total welfare. Welfare is defined as the total income or total expenditure of beneficiary households. Social safety net programs include cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.