Argentina vs Belarus: Adequacy of social safety net programs
Adequacy of social safety net programs over time
- Argentina
- Belarus
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 13.4% against 12.8% in Argentina, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 16th and Belarus ranks 14th of 35 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of social safety net programs, Argentina or Belarus?
- Belarus, at 13.4% against 12.8% in Argentina as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of social safety net programs between Argentina and Belarus?
- 0.6%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Belarus?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2019.
- How do Argentina and Belarus rank globally for adequacy of social safety net programs?
- Argentina ranks 16th and Belarus ranks 14th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Adequacy of social safety net programs (% of total welfare of beneficiary households). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adequacy of social safety net programs is measured by the total transfer amount received by the population participating in social safety net programs as a share of their total welfare. Welfare is defined as the total income or total expenditure of beneficiary households. Social safety net programs include cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.