Brazil vs Georgia: Adequacy of social protection and labor programs
Adequacy of social protection and labor programs over time
- Brazil
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 42.3% against 41.4% in Brazil, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 13th and Georgia ranks 11th of 37 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Georgia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 41.6% | 33.4% | 8.2% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 40.9% | 42.2% | 1.4% | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of social protection and labor programs, Brazil or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 42.3% against 41.4% in Brazil as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of social protection and labor programs between Brazil and Georgia?
- 0.9%, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Georgia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2021.
- How do Brazil and Georgia rank globally for adequacy of social protection and labor programs?
- Brazil ranks 13th and Georgia ranks 11th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Adequacy of social protection and labor programs (% of total welfare of beneficiary households). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adequacy of social protection and labor programs (SPL) is measured by the total transfer amount received by the population participating in social insurance, social safety net, and unemployment benefits and active labor market programs as a share of their total welfare. Welfare is defined as the total income or total expenditure of beneficiary households. Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.