Armenia vs Georgia: Adequacy of social protection and labor programs
Adequacy of social protection and labor programs over time
- Armenia
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 42.3% against 40.8% in Armenia, a difference of 1.5%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 14th and Georgia ranks 11th of 37 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 35.1% | 33.3% | 1.7% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 46.1% | 42.2% | 3.9% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of social protection and labor programs, Armenia or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 42.3% against 40.8% in Armenia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of social protection and labor programs between Armenia and Georgia?
- 1.5%, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Georgia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2021.
- How do Armenia and Georgia rank globally for adequacy of social protection and labor programs?
- Armenia ranks 14th and Georgia ranks 11th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Adequacy of social protection and labor programs (% of total welfare of beneficiary households). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adequacy of social protection and labor programs (SPL) is measured by the total transfer amount received by the population participating in social insurance, social safety net, and unemployment benefits and active labor market programs as a share of their total welfare. Welfare is defined as the total income or total expenditure of beneficiary households. Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.