Belarus vs Republic of Moldova: Adequacy of social insurance programs
Adequacy of social insurance programs over time
- Belarus
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 64.6% against 53.8% in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 10.8%.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.2 times Republic of Moldova's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 4th and Republic of Moldova ranks 7th of 34 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of social insurance programs, Belarus or Republic of Moldova?
- Belarus, at 64.6% against 53.8% in Republic of Moldova as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of social insurance programs between Belarus and Republic of Moldova?
- 10.8%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Republic of Moldova?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2018.
- How do Belarus and Republic of Moldova rank globally for adequacy of social insurance programs?
- Belarus ranks 4th and Republic of Moldova ranks 7th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Adequacy of social insurance programs (% of total welfare of beneficiary households). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adequacy of social insurance programs is measured by the total transfer amount received by the population participating in social insurance programs as a share of their total welfare. Welfare is defined as the total income or total expenditure of beneficiary households. Social insurance programs include old age contributory pensions (including survivors and disability) and social security and health insurance benefits (including occupational injury benefits, paid sick leave, maternity and other social insurance). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.