Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits (%) - International Private Transfers -urban
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
57.7%
in 2017
Kyrgyzstan
69.6%
in 2020
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank
5th
Kyrgyzstan rank
3rd
Adequacy of benefits (%) - International Private Transfers -urban over time
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 69.6% against 57.7% in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), a difference of 11.9%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.2 times Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)'s.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 5th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd of 27 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 84.0% | 57.5% | 26.5% | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) |
| 2010s | 56.1% | 60.6% | 4.4% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits (%) - international private transfers -urban, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 69.6% against 57.7% in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits (%) - international private transfers -urban between Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Kyrgyzstan?
- 11.9%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits (%) - international private transfers -urban?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 5th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group