Honduras vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural
Honduras
19.5%
in 2019
Mongolia
18.8%
in 2020
Honduras rank
12th
Mongolia rank
13th
Adequacy of benefits (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural over time
- Honduras
- Mongolia
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 19.5% against 18.8% in Mongolia, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Honduras ahead.
Honduras ranks 12th and Mongolia ranks 13th of 30 countries.
Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.8% | 15.5% | 3.3% | Honduras |
| 2010s | 17.4% | 15.2% | 2.2% | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits (%) - domestic private transfers -rural, Honduras or Mongolia?
- Honduras, at 19.5% against 18.8% in Mongolia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits (%) - domestic private transfers -rural between Honduras and Mongolia?
- 0.7%, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Mongolia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2018.
- How do Honduras and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits (%) - domestic private transfers -rural?
- Honduras ranks 12th and Mongolia ranks 13th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group