Dominican Republic vs Pakistan: Adequacy of benefits (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural
Dominican Republic
22.5%
in 2021
Pakistan
19.8%
in 2018
Dominican Republic rank
8th
Pakistan rank
11th
Adequacy of benefits (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural over time
- Dominican Republic
- Pakistan
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 22.5% against 19.8% in Pakistan, a difference of 2.7%.
That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Pakistan ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 8th and Pakistan ranks 11th of 30 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.4% | 40.7% | 22.3% | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 19.2% | 34.2% | 15.0% | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits (%) - domestic private transfers -rural, Dominican Republic or Pakistan?
- Dominican Republic, at 22.5% against 19.8% in Pakistan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits (%) - domestic private transfers -rural between Dominican Republic and Pakistan?
- 2.7%, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Pakistan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Dominican Republic and Pakistan rank globally for adequacy of benefits (%) - domestic private transfers -rural?
- Dominican Republic ranks 8th and Pakistan ranks 11th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group