Kazakhstan vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional
Kazakhstan
8.0%
in 2021
Serbia
9.0%
in 2022
Kazakhstan rank
10th
Serbia rank
9th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Kazakhstan
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 9.0% against 8.0% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 1.0%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Serbia ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 10th and Serbia ranks 9th of 26 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.5% | 10.2% | 6.7% | Serbia |
| 2010s | 6.5% | 9.0% | 2.5% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 8.0% | 8.3% | 0.2% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional, Kazakhstan or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 9.0% against 8.0% in Kazakhstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional between Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 1.0%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2021.
- How do Kazakhstan and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional?
- Kazakhstan ranks 10th and Serbia ranks 9th of 26 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group