Kazakhstan vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional
Kazakhstan
7.8%
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan
8.7%
in 2020
Kazakhstan rank
10th
Kyrgyzstan rank
8th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Kazakhstan
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 8.7% against 7.8% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.9%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 10th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 8th of 25 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 13.4% | 9.5% | 3.9% | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 8.7% | 8.7% | 0.0% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional, Kazakhstan or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 8.7% against 7.8% in Kazakhstan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional between Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.9%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2020.
- How do Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional?
- Kazakhstan ranks 10th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 8th of 25 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group