Kazakhstan vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional
Kazakhstan
7.3%
in 2021
Serbia
8.4%
in 2022
Kazakhstan rank
12th
Serbia rank
9th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Kazakhstan
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 8.4% against 7.3% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 1.1%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.2 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Serbia ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 12th and Serbia ranks 9th of 24 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.3% | 7.4% | 6.1% | Serbia |
| 2010s | 6.3% | 8.8% | 2.5% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 7.3% | 7.4% | 0.1% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional, Kazakhstan or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 8.4% against 7.3% in Kazakhstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional between Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 1.1%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2021.
- How do Kazakhstan and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional?
- Kazakhstan ranks 12th and Serbia ranks 9th of 24 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group