Georgia vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional
Georgia
8.2%
in 2021
Serbia
8.4%
in 2022
Georgia rank
10th
Serbia rank
9th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Georgia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 8.4% against 8.2% in Georgia, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Serbia ahead.
Georgia ranks 10th and Serbia ranks 9th of 24 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 11.0% | 10.5% | 0.5% | Georgia |
| 2020s | 8.2% | 7.4% | 0.9% | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional, Georgia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 8.4% against 8.2% in Georgia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional between Georgia and Serbia?
- 0.2%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2021.
- How do Georgia and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional?
- Georgia ranks 10th and Serbia ranks 9th of 24 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group