Georgia vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional
Georgia
8.2%
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan
10.4%
in 2020
Georgia rank
10th
Kyrgyzstan rank
7th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Georgia
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 10.4% against 8.2% in Georgia, a difference of 2.2%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.3 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 10th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 7th of 24 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 10.7% | 9.9% | 0.8% | Georgia |
| 2020s | 9.3% | 10.4% | 1.1% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional, Georgia or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 10.4% against 8.2% in Georgia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional between Georgia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 2.2%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Georgia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional?
- Georgia ranks 10th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 7th of 24 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group