Kyrgyzstan vs Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional
Kyrgyzstan
8.6%
in 2020
Poland
8.7%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan rank
5th
Poland rank
4th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 8.7% against 8.6% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Poland ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 5th and Poland ranks 4th of 26 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.1% | 4.7% | 0.6% | Poland |
| 2010s | 6.5% | 6.0% | 0.4% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional, Kyrgyzstan or Poland?
- Poland, at 8.7% against 8.6% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional between Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 0.1%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Poland rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 5th and Poland ranks 4th of 26 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group