Kazakhstan vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional
Kazakhstan
6.7%
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan
8.6%
in 2020
Kazakhstan rank
7th
Kyrgyzstan rank
5th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Kazakhstan
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 8.6% against 6.7% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 1.9%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.3 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 7th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 5th of 26 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 7.9% | 7.4% | 0.6% | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 6.9% | 8.6% | 1.6% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional, Kazakhstan or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 8.6% against 6.7% in Kazakhstan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional between Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.9%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2020.
- How do Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional?
- Kazakhstan ranks 7th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 5th of 26 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group