Belarus vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional
Belarus
9.3%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan
8.6%
in 2020
Belarus rank
3rd
Kyrgyzstan rank
5th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Belarus
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 9.3% against 8.6% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.7%.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 3rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 5th of 26 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional, Belarus or Kyrgyzstan?
- Belarus, at 9.3% against 8.6% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional between Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.7%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional?
- Belarus ranks 3rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 5th of 26 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group