Peru vs South Africa: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International
Peru
16.6%
in 2022
South Africa
16.7%
in 2021
Peru rank
20th
South Africa rank
18th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International over time
- Peru
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 16.7% against 16.6% in Peru, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was South Africa ahead.
Peru ranks 20th and South Africa ranks 18th of 27 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 16.3% | 21.1% | 4.8% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 17.5% | 23.1% | 5.6% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international, Peru or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 16.7% against 16.6% in Peru as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international between Peru and South Africa?
- 0.1%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Peru and South Africa rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international?
- Peru ranks 20th and South Africa ranks 18th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group