Kosovo vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International
Kosovo
51.4%
in 2017
Kyrgyzstan
53.0%
in 2020
Kosovo rank
5th
Kyrgyzstan rank
4th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International over time
- Kosovo
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 53.0% against 51.4% in Kosovo, a difference of 1.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kosovo ahead.
Kosovo ranks 5th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 4th of 27 countries.
Kosovo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 78.3% | 61.9% | 16.4% | Kosovo |
| 2010s | 60.8% | 51.6% | 9.2% | Kosovo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international, Kosovo or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 53.0% against 51.4% in Kosovo as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international between Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.6%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international?
- Kosovo ranks 5th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 4th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group