Ecuador vs South Africa: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International
Ecuador
18.2%
in 2022
South Africa
16.7%
in 2021
Ecuador rank
16th
South Africa rank
18th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International over time
- Ecuador
- South Africa
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 18.2% against 16.7% in South Africa, a difference of 1.5%.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 16th and South Africa ranks 18th of 27 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 21.6% | 21.1% | 0.5% | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 22.9% | 23.1% | 0.3% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international, Ecuador or South Africa?
- Ecuador, at 18.2% against 16.7% in South Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international between Ecuador and South Africa?
- 1.5%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Ecuador and South Africa rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international?
- Ecuador ranks 16th and South Africa ranks 18th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group