Dominican Republic vs Honduras: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International
Dominican Republic
22.5%
in 2021
Honduras
18.8%
in 2019
Dominican Republic rank
14th
Honduras rank
15th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International over time
- Dominican Republic
- Honduras
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 22.5% against 18.8% in Honduras, a difference of 3.7%.
That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.2 times Honduras's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Honduras ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 14th and Honduras ranks 15th of 27 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Honduras in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.6% | 14.5% | 4.1% | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 14.6% | 18.1% | 3.5% | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international, Dominican Republic or Honduras?
- Dominican Republic, at 22.5% against 18.8% in Honduras as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international between Dominican Republic and Honduras?
- 3.7%, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Honduras?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Dominican Republic and Honduras rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international?
- Dominican Republic ranks 14th and Honduras ranks 15th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group