Armenia vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International
Armenia
63.5%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
53.0%
in 2020
Armenia rank
3rd
Kyrgyzstan rank
4th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International over time
- Armenia
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 63.5% against 53.0% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 10.5%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.2 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Armenia ranks 3rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 4th of 27 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 44.3% | 62.4% | 18.1% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 78.6% | 53.0% | 25.6% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international, Armenia or Kyrgyzstan?
- Armenia, at 63.5% against 53.0% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international between Armenia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 10.5%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Armenia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international?
- Armenia ranks 3rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 4th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group