Armenia vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International
Armenia
64.2%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
62.2%
in 2020
Armenia rank
2nd
Kyrgyzstan rank
3rd
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International over time
- Armenia
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 64.2% against 62.2% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 2.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Armenia ranks 2nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd of 27 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 45.4% | 63.7% | 18.3% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 73.4% | 62.2% | 11.2% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international, Armenia or Kyrgyzstan?
- Armenia, at 64.2% against 62.2% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international between Armenia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 2.0%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Armenia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international?
- Armenia ranks 2nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group