Dominican Republic vs Kazakhstan: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private
Dominican Republic
18.2%
in 2021
Kazakhstan
17.4%
in 2021
Dominican Republic rank
11th
Kazakhstan rank
14th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private over time
- Dominican Republic
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 18.2% against 17.4% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.8%.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Dominican Republic has been ahead every year.
Dominican Republic ranks 11th and Kazakhstan ranks 14th of 31 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 14.9% | 10.8% | 4.2% | Dominican Republic |
| 2020s | 18.2% | 17.4% | 0.8% | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private, Dominican Republic or Kazakhstan?
- Dominican Republic, at 18.2% against 17.4% in Kazakhstan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private between Dominican Republic and Kazakhstan?
- 0.8%, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Kazakhstan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Dominican Republic and Kazakhstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private?
- Dominican Republic ranks 11th and Kazakhstan ranks 14th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group