Dominican Republic vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private
Dominican Republic
16.8%
in 2021
Mongolia
19.0%
in 2020
Dominican Republic rank
12th
Mongolia rank
11th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private over time
- Dominican Republic
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 19.0% against 16.8% in Dominican Republic, a difference of 2.2%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Dominican Republic's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Mongolia ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 12th and Mongolia ranks 11th of 30 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.1% | 16.8% | 3.7% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 12.6% | 13.6% | 1.0% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private, Dominican Republic or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 19.0% against 16.8% in Dominican Republic as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private between Dominican Republic and Mongolia?
- 2.2%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Mongolia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Dominican Republic and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - domestic private?
- Dominican Republic ranks 12th and Mongolia ranks 11th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group