Kazakhstan vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social
Kazakhstan
47.1%
in 2021
Serbia
45.8%
in 2022
Kazakhstan rank
5th
Serbia rank
6th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social over time
- Kazakhstan
- Serbia
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 47.1% against 45.8% in Serbia, a difference of 1.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Serbia ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 5th and Serbia ranks 6th of 37 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.0% | 42.4% | 35.4% | Serbia |
| 2010s | 37.6% | 47.8% | 10.2% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 47.1% | 39.9% | 7.1% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social, Kazakhstan or Serbia?
- Kazakhstan, at 47.1% against 45.8% in Serbia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social between Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 1.3%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2021.
- How do Kazakhstan and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social?
- Kazakhstan ranks 5th and Serbia ranks 6th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group