Belarus vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social
Belarus
36.4%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan
37.7%
in 2020
Belarus rank
15th
Kyrgyzstan rank
13th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social over time
- Belarus
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 37.7% against 36.4% in Belarus, a difference of 1.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Belarus ranks 15th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 13th of 37 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social, Belarus or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 37.7% against 36.4% in Belarus as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social between Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.3%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social?
- Belarus ranks 15th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 13th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group