Costa Rica vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social
Costa Rica
41.6%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
43.4%
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
9th
Kyrgyzstan rank
8th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social over time
- Costa Rica
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 43.4% against 41.6% in Costa Rica, a difference of 1.8%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 9th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 8th of 36 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 34.8% | 40.3% | 5.5% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 41.7% | 43.4% | 1.7% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social, Costa Rica or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 43.4% against 41.6% in Costa Rica as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social between Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.8%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -all social?
- Costa Rica ranks 9th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 8th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group