Kyrgyzstan vs Ukraine: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social
Kyrgyzstan
38.2%
in 2020
Ukraine
38.7%
in 2020
Kyrgyzstan rank
20th
Ukraine rank
18th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Ukraine
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports 38.7% against 38.2% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Ukraine ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 20th and Ukraine ranks 18th of 34 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Ukraine in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.0% | 34.2% | 11.2% | Ukraine |
| 2010s | 38.0% | 36.6% | 1.5% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 38.2% | 38.7% | 0.5% | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social, Kyrgyzstan or Ukraine?
- Ukraine, at 38.7% against 38.2% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social between Kyrgyzstan and Ukraine?
- 0.5%, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Ukraine?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Ukraine rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 20th and Ukraine ranks 18th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Insurance. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group