Ecuador vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social
Ecuador
35.5%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
38.2%
in 2020
Ecuador rank
22nd
Kyrgyzstan rank
20th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social over time
- Ecuador
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 38.2% against 35.5% in Ecuador, a difference of 2.7%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 22nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 20th of 34 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 36.6% | 38.3% | 1.7% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 11.2% | 38.2% | 27.0% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social, Ecuador or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 38.2% against 35.5% in Ecuador as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social between Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 2.7%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social?
- Ecuador ranks 22nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 20th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Insurance. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group