Kazakhstan vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social
Kazakhstan
52.6%
in 2021
Serbia
53.9%
in 2022
Kazakhstan rank
6th
Serbia rank
5th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social over time
- Kazakhstan
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 53.9% against 52.6% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 1.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Serbia ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 6th and Serbia ranks 5th of 34 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.5% | 45.4% | 37.8% | Serbia |
| 2010s | 43.8% | 53.3% | 9.5% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 52.6% | 44.5% | 8.1% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social, Kazakhstan or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 53.9% against 52.6% in Kazakhstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social between Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 1.3%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2021.
- How do Kazakhstan and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social?
- Kazakhstan ranks 6th and Serbia ranks 5th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group