Belarus vs Turkey: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social
Belarus
41.1%
in 2019
Turkey
40.7%
in 2019
Belarus rank
13th
Turkey rank
14th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social over time
- Belarus
- Turkey
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 41.1% against 40.7% in Turkey, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 13th and Turkey ranks 14th of 34 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Turkey | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34.7% | 33.9% | 0.8% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 37.9% | 35.6% | 2.3% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social, Belarus or Turkey?
- Belarus, at 41.1% against 40.7% in Turkey as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social between Belarus and Turkey?
- 0.4%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Turkey?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Turkey rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social?
- Belarus ranks 13th and Turkey ranks 14th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group