Kyrgyzstan vs Ukraine: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social
Kyrgyzstan
34.6%
in 2020
Ukraine
33.1%
in 2020
Kyrgyzstan rank
18th
Ukraine rank
20th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Ukraine
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 34.6% against 33.1% in Ukraine, a difference of 1.5%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Ukraine ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 18th and Ukraine ranks 20th of 31 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 2 and Ukraine in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.7% | 35.8% | 14.0% | Ukraine |
| 2010s | 37.6% | 34.5% | 3.2% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 34.6% | 33.1% | 1.6% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social, Kyrgyzstan or Ukraine?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 34.6% against 33.1% in Ukraine as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social between Kyrgyzstan and Ukraine?
- 1.5%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Ukraine?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Ukraine rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 18th and Ukraine ranks 20th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group