Kyrgyzstan vs Mexico: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social
Kyrgyzstan
34.6%
in 2020
Mexico
34.9%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan rank
18th
Mexico rank
17th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 34.9% against 34.6% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 18th and Mexico ranks 17th of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Mexico in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 38.6% | 31.3% | 7.4% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 34.6% | 35.1% | 0.5% | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social, Kyrgyzstan or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 34.9% against 34.6% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social between Kyrgyzstan and Mexico?
- 0.3%, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Mexico?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Mexico rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 18th and Mexico ranks 17th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group