Kazakhstan vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social
Kazakhstan
12.6%
in 2021
Serbia
12.5%
in 2022
Kazakhstan rank
4th
Serbia rank
5th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social over time
- Kazakhstan
- Serbia
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 12.6% against 12.5% in Serbia, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Serbia ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 4th and Serbia ranks 5th of 35 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.9% | 12.1% | 10.2% | Serbia |
| 2010s | 9.8% | 16.2% | 6.4% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 12.6% | 18.6% | 6.1% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social, Kazakhstan or Serbia?
- Kazakhstan, at 12.6% against 12.5% in Serbia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social between Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 0.1%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2021.
- How do Kazakhstan and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social?
- Kazakhstan ranks 4th and Serbia ranks 5th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Assistance. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group