Kazakhstan vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social
Kazakhstan
12.1%
in 2021
Serbia
12.2%
in 2022
Kazakhstan rank
8th
Serbia rank
7th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social over time
- Kazakhstan
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 12.2% against 12.1% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Serbia ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 8th and Serbia ranks 7th of 34 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.7% | 13.5% | 11.9% | Serbia |
| 2010s | 9.0% | 16.7% | 7.7% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 12.1% | 17.4% | 5.3% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social, Kazakhstan or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 12.2% against 12.1% in Kazakhstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social between Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 0.1%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2021.
- How do Kazakhstan and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social?
- Kazakhstan ranks 8th and Serbia ranks 7th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Assistance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group