Chile vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social
Chile
12.3%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
12.9%
in 2020
Chile rank
6th
Kyrgyzstan rank
3rd
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social over time
- Chile
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 12.9% against 12.3% in Chile, a difference of 0.6%.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 6th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd of 34 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.1% | 3.9% | 2.8% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 2.8% | 7.8% | 4.9% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 5.5% | 12.9% | 7.4% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social, Chile or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 12.9% against 12.3% in Chile as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social between Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.6%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social?
- Chile ranks 6th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Assistance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group