Armenia vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social
Armenia
25.2%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
12.9%
in 2020
Armenia rank
1st
Kyrgyzstan rank
3rd
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social over time
- Armenia
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 25.2% against 12.9% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 12.3%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 2.0 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 1st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd of 34 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 14.4% | 9.4% | 5.0% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 24.9% | 12.9% | 12.0% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social, Armenia or Kyrgyzstan?
- Armenia, at 25.2% against 12.9% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social between Armenia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 12.3%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Armenia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all social?
- Armenia ranks 1st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Social Assistance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group