Mongolia vs Viet Nam: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private
Mongolia
42.9%
in 2020
Viet Nam
43.1%
in 2020
Mongolia rank
11th
Viet Nam rank
10th
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Mongolia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 43.1% against 42.9% in Mongolia, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Mongolia ranks 11th and Viet Nam ranks 10th of 27 countries.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 30.3% | 35.0% | 4.8% | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 42.9% | 43.1% | 0.2% | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private, Mongolia or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 43.1% against 42.9% in Mongolia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private between Mongolia and Viet Nam?
- 0.2%, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Viet Nam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Viet Nam rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private?
- Mongolia ranks 11th and Viet Nam ranks 10th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group