Kosovo vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private
Kosovo
67.7%
in 2017
Kyrgyzstan
69.7%
in 2020
Kosovo rank
3rd
Kyrgyzstan rank
2nd
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Kosovo
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 69.7% against 67.7% in Kosovo, a difference of 2.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kosovo ahead.
Kosovo ranks 3rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 2nd of 27 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kosovo averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.7% | 59.2% | 21.5% | Kosovo |
| 2010s | 53.8% | 57.7% | 3.9% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private, Kosovo or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 69.7% against 67.7% in Kosovo as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private between Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan?
- 2.0%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private?
- Kosovo ranks 3rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 2nd of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group