Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
67.7%
in 2017
Kyrgyzstan
69.7%
in 2020
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank
3rd
Kyrgyzstan rank
2nd
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 69.7% against 67.7% in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), a difference of 2.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 3rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 2nd of 27 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.7% | 59.2% | 21.5% | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) |
| 2010s | 53.8% | 57.7% | 3.9% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 69.7% against 67.7% in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private between Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Kyrgyzstan?
- 2.0%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 3rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 2nd of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group