Ecuador vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private
Ecuador
24.9%
in 2022
Serbia
28.5%
in 2022
Ecuador rank
16th
Serbia rank
14th
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Ecuador
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 28.5% against 24.9% in Ecuador, a difference of 3.6%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 16th and Serbia ranks 14th of 27 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 25.5% | 40.6% | 15.1% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 24.0% | 26.7% | 2.7% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private, Ecuador or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 28.5% against 24.9% in Ecuador as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private between Ecuador and Serbia?
- 3.6%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Ecuador and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private?
- Ecuador ranks 16th and Serbia ranks 14th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group