Dominican Republic vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private
Dominican Republic
23.1%
in 2021
Serbia
28.5%
in 2022
Dominican Republic rank
17th
Serbia rank
14th
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Dominican Republic
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 28.5% against 23.1% in Dominican Republic, a difference of 5.4%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.2 times Dominican Republic's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 17th and Serbia ranks 14th of 27 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.8% | 18.8% | 2.0% | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 20.5% | 40.9% | 20.4% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 23.1% | 24.9% | 1.8% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private, Dominican Republic or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 28.5% against 23.1% in Dominican Republic as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private between Dominican Republic and Serbia?
- 5.4%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Serbia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2021.
- How do Dominican Republic and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private?
- Dominican Republic ranks 17th and Serbia ranks 14th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group