Dominican Republic vs Ecuador: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private
Dominican Republic
23.1%
in 2021
Ecuador
24.9%
in 2022
Dominican Republic rank
17th
Ecuador rank
16th
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Dominican Republic
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 24.9% against 23.1% in Dominican Republic, a difference of 1.8%.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Dominican Republic's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Ecuador ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 17th and Ecuador ranks 16th of 27 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.9% | 30.6% | 9.7% | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 21.2% | 25.7% | 4.5% | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 23.1% | 23.1% | 0.0% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private, Dominican Republic or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 24.9% against 23.1% in Dominican Republic as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private between Dominican Republic and Ecuador?
- 1.8%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Ecuador?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2021.
- How do Dominican Republic and Ecuador rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private?
- Dominican Republic ranks 17th and Ecuador ranks 16th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group