Kosovo vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private
Kosovo
75.5%
in 2017
Kyrgyzstan
80.2%
in 2020
Kosovo rank
3rd
Kyrgyzstan rank
2nd
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Kosovo
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 80.2% against 75.5% in Kosovo, a difference of 4.7%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Kosovo's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kosovo ahead.
Kosovo ranks 3rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 2nd of 27 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kosovo averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 91.4% | 52.8% | 38.6% | Kosovo |
| 2010s | 55.0% | 56.4% | 1.5% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private, Kosovo or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 80.2% against 75.5% in Kosovo as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private between Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan?
- 4.7%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private?
- Kosovo ranks 3rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 2nd of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group