Ecuador vs South Africa: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private
Ecuador
24.5%
in 2022
South Africa
30.6%
in 2021
Ecuador rank
15th
South Africa rank
12th
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Ecuador
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 30.6% against 24.5% in Ecuador, a difference of 6.1%.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.3 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was South Africa ahead.
Ecuador ranks 15th and South Africa ranks 12th of 27 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 21.6% | 34.4% | 12.8% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 22.9% | 36.5% | 13.7% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private, Ecuador or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 30.6% against 24.5% in Ecuador as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private between Ecuador and South Africa?
- 6.1%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Ecuador and South Africa rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private?
- Ecuador ranks 15th and South Africa ranks 12th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group