Ecuador vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private
Ecuador
24.5%
in 2022
Serbia
26.7%
in 2022
Ecuador rank
15th
Serbia rank
13th
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Ecuador
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 26.7% against 24.5% in Ecuador, a difference of 2.2%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 15th and Serbia ranks 13th of 27 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 23.6% | 32.8% | 9.2% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 22.9% | 24.3% | 1.4% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private, Ecuador or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 26.7% against 24.5% in Ecuador as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private between Ecuador and Serbia?
- 2.2%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Ecuador and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private?
- Ecuador ranks 15th and Serbia ranks 13th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group