Dominican Republic vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private
Dominican Republic
24.7%
in 2021
Serbia
26.7%
in 2022
Dominican Republic rank
14th
Serbia rank
13th
Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Dominican Republic
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 26.7% against 24.7% in Dominican Republic, a difference of 2.0%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Dominican Republic's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 14th and Serbia ranks 13th of 27 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.1% | 19.3% | 3.8% | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 21.2% | 35.1% | 13.9% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 24.7% | 21.9% | 2.8% | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private, Dominican Republic or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 26.7% against 24.7% in Dominican Republic as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private between Dominican Republic and Serbia?
- 2.0%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Serbia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2021.
- How do Dominican Republic and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - international private?
- Dominican Republic ranks 14th and Serbia ranks 13th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 4th quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group